While we have been told that when using images, within a classroom, they should be relevant to the topic and content, but is that really true? According to Stefanov (2008), an author and speaker on 'Exceptional Performance', images are the main tool that first catches and then engages the viewer. When researching the percentage of websites that is 'images' the results were a shock to me. I could not believe the high percentage of images that made-up the website and it was all for one reason: 'Catching the viewers eye, and then keeping them engaged' (or so they explore the website further).

So, if websites know it's the main engaging tool to use why shouldn't teachers be using it as a major tool too?
I believe some sort of image should be used within every lesson, especially with younger grades and the majority of the time they should be relevant to the content. However, I do not see a problem with using a random image of a find-a-word or using that image for a colouring-in etc, for extra work in a early childhood classroom.
What is your opinion?





